News
-
News Articles
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
-
March 2017
- Spring flush unlikely to pressure fat prices
- 2017-18 milk production tracker
- Payments on EU milk reduction scheme lower than expected
- GB milk production rise is not unusual
- More SMP intervention stock on the cards?
- Does SMP in intervention have a use-by date?
- EU forecast rise in 2017 milk production
- Counting the cost of potential trade tariffs
- EU dairy herd falls in 2016…albeit marginally
- Dutch dairy cull could pick up speed
- Reduced interest for SMP intervention stocks
- FMP produces negative figure for first time in a year
- Money in meeting buyer milk specifications
- GDT price tumbles as forecast volumes grow
- Storage Aid closes at peak use and still no intervention sales
- How high will milk production go?
- Get more for your milk with AHDB Dairy’s revised Milk Price Calculator
- New appointment to roll out whole-farm benchmarking across UK
- Take part in LEAF Open Farm Sunday, 11th June 2017
- New Board Members for AHDB Dairy
- New Mastitis PTA will be launched next month
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- Archive
- Technical Articles
- News Archive
Money in meeting buyer milk specifications
Published 8 March 17
The price farmers can achieve for the milk they produce will differ depending not only on who they sell to, but also how well it matches the buyers’ requirements. An assessment of just how much can be gained by aligning milk components to buyers’ needs can be done using the AHDB Milk Price Calculator (MPC). From early March, the MPC will be easier to use and feature a regional filter, to make the results more specific to your local area.
Analysis done by AHDB, looking at the impact of different milk quality bands on price (see end of article), found prices on the same contract could differ by more than 6.1ppl due to the composition of the milk and 1.3ppl for different levels of hygiene.
On average, the main impact of hygiene on prices comes from penalties applied to milk which fails to meet specified levels rather than from bonuses for higher quality. On average, milk with lower hygiene levels (see below for specifications) loses between 0.5ppl and 0.7ppl compared to the average, with aligned liquid pricing schedules applying the highest deductions.
The impact of milk composition on prices was much larger, with prices paid on milk for manufacturing more affected than those for milk going to the liquid market. Milk delivered with lower levels of solids was paid, on average, between 0.8 and 2.4ppl less than the average depending on the type of contract. Milk with higher solids achieved between 0.5ppl-1.8ppl more than the average.
While it remains important to avoid penalties by meeting minimum hygiene standards, in general, there appears to be more potential to improve milk prices by adjusting composition.
The analysis undertaken has looked at the general penalties and premiums for milk into different markets. Farmers are encouraged to use the MPC to look at their own specific situation. Using the MPC can highlight if there is potential to improve your milk price by better aligning your milk to your customer’s requirements. Using this information, alongside the investment cost of making the improvement, can help farmers decide what will give them the most beneficial return on their investment.
Milk quality bands:
The data used in each band were based on the top and bottom 25% for hygiene levels and for composition of a sample of milk deliveries from 368 farms and are summarised in the table. Averages were calculated using monthly data for butterfat, protein, bactoscan and SCC levels for 2016. The AHDB Standard Litre delivery profile for 2016 was used for all groups to exclude any seasonality impacts.